Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +561%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G94B
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy