Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 330 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +296%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 330 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G92
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy