Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +27%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
0.749 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
288
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF114
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy