Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1019MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690 +228%
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
May 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK104
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy