Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +803%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Fiji
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy