Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +211%
0.952 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK107
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy