Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1440MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +984%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GA100
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy