Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (930MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +58%
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
May 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
36.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Oland
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy