Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (930MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +90%
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Oland
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy