Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 460

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1200MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 +125%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Baffin
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy