Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8800

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +33%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1600
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Cypress
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy