Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +98%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy