Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +203%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Turks
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy