Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +208%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cayman
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy