Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +421%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy