Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon R9 270 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 +42%
2.368 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jul 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy