Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +1678%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
1792
Shading Units
72
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT215
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy