Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +2043%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
29W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF119
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy