Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +318%
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4810
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
160.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
95W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV770 CE (215-0669093)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy