Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro 2270

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro 2270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +4166%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro 2270
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
80
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cedar WS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy