Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon HD 5630

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI Radeon HD 5630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +884%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5630
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
39W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Redwood LE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy