Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV380
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
20W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy