Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +1238%
4.096 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
35W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK107
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy