Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 375W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2005
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
83W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
NV41
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy