Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +59%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy