Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +210%
3.29 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GM107
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
68W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy