Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +328%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
480
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Turks
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy