Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +1858%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Feb 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV630
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy