Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +98%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy