Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 350X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +308%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350X OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
May 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Oland
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy