Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +21%
3.29 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GA107
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy