Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +72%
4.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1152
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.77 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.07 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.378 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
170W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GK104
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy