Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +30%
4.104 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
32bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy