Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +216%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3840
176
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy