Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +6940%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
80
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
17W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cedar
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy