Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +983%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
400
176
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
43W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Redwood
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy