Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +74%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
225W
950 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy