Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +35%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2304
176
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
250W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK110
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy