Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (158W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO V710 +390%
27.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
224bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
54
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3456
176
TMUs
216
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
158W
950 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 32
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy