Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 8GB VRAM T1000 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +125%
5.632 TFLOPS
T1000 8 GB
2.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
896
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
50W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy