Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 500W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2005
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
83W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
NV41
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy