Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +11843%
5.733 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Feb 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV620
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy