Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (85W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +34%
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
RV770
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy