Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 380 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380
3.476 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +245%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
3.476 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
3.476 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
217.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
AD107
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy