Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (190W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY
7.168 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +345%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Navi 32
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy