Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +326%
8.602 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1440
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cypress
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy