Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +29562%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G86
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy