AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)

3456 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock1455MHz

Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +361%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1050

1.862 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X +192%

5173

GeForce GTX 1050

1769

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +275%

30

GeForce GTX 1050

8

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +261%

65

GeForce GTX 1050

18

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X +158%

80

GeForce GTX 1050

31

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce GTX 1050

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Oct 2016

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1354 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1455 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1752 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

112.1GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

5

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

640

256

TMUs

40

64

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

46.56 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

58.20 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

29.10 GFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.862 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

58.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GP107

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GP107-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

14 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

3.3 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

132 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition

4

AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Related News

1

Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher

2

It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95

3

AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models

4

AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon

5

Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September

6

Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations

7

Elon Musk Responds to Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: Humanoid Robots Will Be Ten Times More Common than Cars

8

AMD Revives Multi-GPU Support: Up to Four Cards and 192GB VRAM

9

TSMC Explores Advanced Chip Packaging Technology: Switches to Rectangular Substrate, Nearly Tripling Usable Area on 300mm Wafers

10

Western Digital WD Blue SN5000 SSD Launched: Up to 8TB Capacity with Mixed TLC/QLC Flash