Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1972%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy