AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock1665MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

768 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (200W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +88%

16.2 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +125%

11663

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +63%

49

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +43%

93

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +61%

129

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Dec 2020

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1410 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

38

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

4864

256

TMUs

152

64

ROPs

80

-

Tensor Cores

152

-

RT Cores

38

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

133.2 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

253.1 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

16.20 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.20 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

253.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GA104

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GA104-200-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

8 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

200W

600 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products